[Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
Dow Hurst DPHURST
DPHURST at uncg.edu
Thu Mar 26 20:32:23 PDT 2009
We've got a couple of weeks max to finalize spec'ing a new cluster. Has
anyone knowledge of lowering latency for NAMD by implementing a
multi-rail IB solution using MVAPICH or Intel's MPI? My research tells
me low latency is key to scaling our code of choice, NAMD, effectively. Has anyone cut down real effective latency
to below 1.0us using multi-rail IB for molecular dynamics codes such Gromacs, Amber, CHARMM, or NAMD? What about lowered latency for parallel abnitio calculations involving NwChem, Jaguar, or Gaussian using multi-rail IB?
If so, what was the configuration of cards and software? Any caveats
involved, except price?
Multi-rail IB is not something I know much about so am trying to get up to speed on what is possible and what is not. I do understand that lowering latency using multi-rail has to come from the MPI layer knowing how to use the hardware properly and some MPI implementations have such options and others don't. I understand that MVAPICH has some capabilities to use multi-rail and that NAMD is run on top of MVAPICH on many IB based clusters. Any links or pointers to how I can quickly educate myself on the topic would be appreciated.
Dow P. Hurst, Research Scientist
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
435 New Science Bldg.
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
dphurst at uncg.edu
Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Beowulf