[Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Gerry Creager gerry.creager at tamu.eduTue Jun 30 06:10:59 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave Love wrote: > Gerry Creager <gerry.creager at tamu.edu> writes: > >> I had rather nasty results with tg3 and abandoned it. We're using bnx2 >> now. The latest iteration seems (guardedly) better than the last one. > > I thought that they were for different hardware (NetXtreme I > c.f. NetXtreme II, according to broadcom.com). Is that not the case? > > If bnx2 behaves the same as tg3 here, set rx-frames to 1 with ethtool. Anaconda (CentOS2 originally installed a tg3 driver. Performance sucked (technical term) with that and we went to a bnx2 driver consistent with our understanding of the hardware. It sucked less. Not until a recent combined BIOS update on the Dell 1950s and a new bnx2 driver, have I begun to see decent operation at 9000 byte frames. gerry -- Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983 Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
