[Beowulf] typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns hearnsj at googlemail.comTue Jun 30 00:01:55 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/6/29 Rahul Nabar <rpnabar at gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Mark Hahn<hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote: > > Thanks for all the help Mark! > > >> well, ping is not _really_ a benchmark ;) > > I thought so! :) Lazy person's first shot. Now I will try ethtool. > Rahul, its maybe worth making something explicitly clear. When folks on this list talk about 'latency' they are talking about times for sending MPI messages. The Pallas and OMB benchmarks suggested do that. When you use 'ping' you are measuring the trip time for IP ICMP packages, which, yep, is a valid measurement and gives a good idea of performance.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
