[Beowulf] typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comMon Jun 29 14:24:48 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Mark Hahn<hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote: Thanks for all the help Mark! > well, ping is not _really_ a benchmark ;) I thought so! :) Lazy person's first shot. Now I will try ethtool. > but it does sound like you have interrupt coalescing enabled. Any way to verify if I do? > ping is also reporting round-trip, Ah! So my "real" latencies are 140/2 = 70 microsecs. That doesn't sound so terribly bad now. > well, look at "ethtool -c" output and try with "ping -s 20". Tried this. No improvement. Still round-trip-pings are in the 140 microsec range. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: typical latencies for gigabit ethernet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
