[Beowulf] OpenFOAM, Linux & Compilers
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Hearns, John john.hearns at mclaren.comMon Jun 22 09:24:16 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OpenFOAM, Linux & Compilers
- Next message: [Beowulf] noobs: what comes next?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org [mailto:beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] > On Behalf Of Dmitry Zaletnev > Sent: 20 June 2009 18:24 > To: beowulf at beowulf.org > Subject: [Beowulf] OpenFOAM, Linux & Compilers > > Dear Sir/Madam! > A few days ago I tried to compile OpenFOAM, I didn't succeed in > compiling paraFoam, neiteher I didn't succeed in using ParaView 3.4, That's a boat load of questions! An executable is the actual program file of machine instructions which you run. I'd guess Windows has the same - think of .exe files! Regarding Gentoo, it does indeed recompile system executables every time they are installed, The thinking being you get best performance when they are optimised for your exact architectire. Me, I say if you want to run a code like Openfoam or other scientific application stick to a mainstream distribution. Like Redhat Enterprise, Fedora, SuSE (Enterprise or OpenSUSE). I may be wrong, as I am not a Gentoo weenie. The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error you should not copy it, retransmit it, use it or disclose its contents but should return it to the sender immediately and delete your copy.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OpenFOAM, Linux & Compilers
- Next message: [Beowulf] noobs: what comes next?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
