[Beowulf] HPC fault tolerance using virtualization
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Jun 17 12:10:07 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] HPC fault tolerance using virtualization
- Next message: [Beowulf] HPC fault tolerance using virtualization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> out of curiosity, why do you call this sort of thing HPC? > I think "batch" or perhaps "throughput" covers it, but why _high_performance_, > if in fact it composed of all routine-performance pieces? It's a calling a duck a duck issue. "Warehouse computing" looks a lot like ethernet-connected HPC clusters, only larger. I can't afford to waste a couple of days running Linpack, so my clusters don't appear on the Top500. I do a mix of embarrassingly parallel jobs and tightly-coupled parallel computations. It looks a lot like how the oil & gas industry uses clusters. -- greg (wearing my Blekko hat)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] HPC fault tolerance using virtualization
- Next message: [Beowulf] HPC fault tolerance using virtualization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
