[Beowulf] Re: dedupe Filesystem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kilian CAVALOTTI kilian.cavalotti.work at gmail.comFri Jun 5 05:39:24 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: dedupe Filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Webinar: Optimizing the Nehalem for HPC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 14:24:19 Lawrence Stewart wrote: > I probably don't need to remind anyone here that deduplication on a > live filesystem (as opposed to backups) can have really bad > performance effects. Imagine if you have to move the disk arms around > for every file for every block of every file. Modern filesystems do > well at keeping files contiguous and often keep all the files of a > directory nearly. This locality gets trashed by deduplicaiton. This > won't matter if the problem is making backups smaller or making > incrementals run faster, but it is not good for the performance of a > live filesystem. It's kind of new to me, but it looks like some vendors have block-level deduplication systems integrated in some of their product lines. See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/05/dell_block_dedupe/ or http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/01/quantum_extends_dxi/ > -Larry/thinking about what to do next :( Cheers, -- Kilian
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: dedupe Filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Webinar: Optimizing the Nehalem for HPC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
