[Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jan Heichler jan.heichler at gmx.netWed Jul 15 12:31:50 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Next message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hallo Orion, Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009, meintest Du: >> Can you give a bit more Info? >> Network Storage Server = NFS? OP> NFS, though I'm open for trying other options. Well...NFS is a good start... if 100 MB/s is enough for your purposes. NFS does not work very well on higher speeds - the protocoll seems to have quite some overhead. >> Why SSDs? >> OP> Performance per watt, $? I'm happy to be corrected. Well. SSD is very expensive - and not necessarily more energy efficient. I would vote for 2.5" SATA drives. With the Supermicro SC216 for example you can have 24 disks. Add a 3ware 9650SE-24 to build a raidset. >> What speed do you want to reach? OP> I'd be happy with saturating 1 GigE ( ~ 100MB/s ?) to start, with some OP> headroom. Don't want to break the bank though for the last bit of OP> performance. To reach 100 MB/s you can probably start with 8+2 disks in a RAID6. That should give you enough to saturate a single 1GE link. >> In general: RAM does help, CPU power is normally not necessary. OP> That's my feeling, but wondering how low on the cpu to go. Is a dual OP> (physical) processor system a help? Well... single socket, dualcore is perfectly fine to saturate a 1GE Link. Jan
- Previous message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Next message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
