[Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduMon Jan 26 15:21:23 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?]
- Next message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I was puzzling over the best approach for testing memory and found: http://www.memtest86.com/tech.html#philo In particular: Memory chips consist of a large array of tightly packed memory cells, one for each bit of data. The vast majority of the intermittent failures are a result of interaction between these memory cells. Often writing a memory cell can cause one of the adjacent cells to be written with the same data. They discuss one algorithm, then an improved algorithm one that works even with caches. Seems plausible, sure a custom kernel will allow testing a larger fraction of ram. Seems like a good place to start for a user space test for a live system, not sure if any of the other programs mentioned have a similar approach. Comments?
- Previous message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?]
- Next message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
