[Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Forrest jlforrest at berkeley.eduWed Jan 21 16:19:55 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] tcp error: Need ideas!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Many of us have lots of disk storage as part of our clusters. One issue I always face when buying RAID storage is whether to get the more expensive "enterprise" drives or to go ahead and settle for the consumer grade drives. The last time I checked, the enterprise drives were ~25% more expensive than the consumer drives. This difference might have changed since then. I've tried to find out what the differences are between the enterprise vs. the consumer drives. I've heard different answers. One answer I've heard is that the enterprise drives use "better" firmware than the consumer drives. I wasn't sure whether I should accept this explanation, especially since those famous papers from Google and CMU said that they didn't see any significant differences between the two types of drives. Also, since (until recently) the manufacturer's warranty was the same on both drive types, I was skeptical about the differences between the drives. In the last week or so, it has come to light that Seagate has a big problem with their 1TB disk drives (and others). (See http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=storage&articleId=9126360&taxonomyId=19&intsrc=kc_top and http://forums.seagate.com/stx/board/message?board.id=ata_drives&thread.id=3668 for coverage of the problem) What's interesting about this is that *both* the consumer (e.g Barracuda 7200.11) and enterprise (e.g. Barracuda ES.2) versions of the Seagate drives have the same firmware problem, or at least are suffering from the same firmware bug. This makes me wonder about how different their firmware must be. I'm glad I've been buying the consumer drives because, at least as far as this problem is concerned, my life wouldn't have been improved if I had spent the extra money for the enterprise drives. Cordially, -- Jon Forrest Research Computing Support College of Chemistry 173 Tan Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1460 510-643-1032 jlforrest at berkeley.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] tcp error: Need ideas!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
