[Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Jan 21 13:24:13 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> I guess our premises are quite different. > > Yes, they are. Hence your statement about "obviously burning money" > was a bit of an over-generalization ;) well, it was in answer to the OP, who seemed to be asking about HPC clusters, not (apparently) the search engine web services you do (very large BW costs, and apparent need to be located in expensive surrounds, and yet with fairly cheap nodes.) one useful thing came out of this thread, which is that in a lot of places, power is dramatically more expensive than other places (ie, >4x). so whether fast replacement is money-burning actually depends on both high energy costs, but also whether new hardware is significantly more power-efficient. I guess I'm still a little surprised at your situation - how has your node-power vs search-performance figure changed recently? flops/W "obviously" has, but I would have guessed search stuff to be disk or memory-dominated. (both of which have certainly improved over the past few years, but much more gradually, no?) > There are HPC systems that want UPSes, namely ones that do > mission-critical things, like weather forecasts, and spooky work. > Most university HPC systems don't fall into that category. Most it may be of interest that we see 1-2 unplanned power outage/year for most of our sites. though admittedly we also have a couple smaller sites where it's more like 30/year. > my cluster looks pretty much like an HPC cluster, albeit one with > only gbit ethernet and lots of local disk. ah! so it appears that disks have improved their active and idle power figures by a factor of ~2 over the past year or so, after having remained fairly steady before that. is that right? I'm only talking about what I think of as the mass market: 3.5" sata. or do you use 2.5" laptopy disks? still only ~10W/disk - I would expect MTBF/AFR/warranty-based considerations would more drive your replacement cycle...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
