[Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Aquilina eagles051387 at gmail.comMon Jan 19 23:14:35 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
in all honesty is there a need really to replace the cluster. why not just add onto it? On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Robert G. Brown <rgb at phy.duke.edu> wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 08:10:43PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: >> >>> The question was raised as "When should all these servers be upgraded or >>>> replaced again?" >>>> >>> >>> 3-5 years, IMO. if you replace hardware in <3 years, you're obviously >>> burning money. >>> >> >> After factoring in rent and utilities, my replacement time is < 3 >> years. So what's obvious to you doesn't seem very obvious to me! >> > > Right. There are rules of thumb, but they are based on assumptions, and > if the assumptions aren't applicable they will lead to non-optimal > behavior. The right rule is "do the cost-benefit analysis and act > according to what it tells you". Which will, in fact, often lead to 3-5 > year replacement cycle. But additional costs along the way alter the > landscape, shifting to different replacement cycles. > > To do the computation correctly, you have to include all sorts of > marginal costs and benefits. For example, sometimes there are nonlinear > benefits to finishing work faster, which favors shorter cycles. > Sometimes there are nonlinear costs (or higher than normal linear > costs, which ALSO favors shorter cycles. > > On the other hand, if somebody else pays for the power, and you have no > source of money to buy replacement nodes, you run nodes until they die. > All the "usual" CBAs assume a constant flow of support moneys for new > nodes, and that is not always the case. > > rgb > > >> -- greg >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit >> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >> >> > Robert G. Brown Phone(cell): 1-919-280-8443 > Duke University Physics Dept, Box 90305 > Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 > Web: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb > Book of Lilith Website: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Lilith/Lilith.php > Lulu Bookstore: http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=877977 > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Jonathan Aquilina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20090120/a2e18edf/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Capitalization Rates - How often should you replace a cluster? (resent - 1st sending wasn't posted ).
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
