[Beowulf] Nehalem and Shanghai code performance for our rzf example
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David N. Lombard dnlombar at ichips.intel.comMon Jan 19 09:08:49 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem and Shanghai code performance for our rzf example
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nehalem and Shanghai code performance for our rzf example
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:14:12AM -0800, Kevin Abbey wrote: > Hi Joe, > Can that 9% difference be due to the Intel capability to overclock one > core and turn the others off? > Or is does this Intel feature require manual switch somewhere? More info on Turbo Boot is here <http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost/> -- David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem and Shanghai code performance for our rzf example
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nehalem and Shanghai code performance for our rzf example
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list