[Beowulf] Please help to setup Beowulf
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bogdan Costescu Bogdan.Costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.deFri Feb 20 06:37:08 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Please help to setup Beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Please help to setup Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Glen Beane wrote: > I looked into SGE a long time ago, but I found the MPI support > terrible when compared to TORQUE/PBS Pro Indeed and AFAIK is still in a similar state today. There was talk for a long time on the SGE devel list for a TM API to be added, but it seems like this is not considered a high priority feature. I've not only looked but actually used SGE for about 1 year (IIRC, about 5 years ago) during which I had to spend time fixing the interactions with LAM/MPI and many of the parallel applications that were used on that cluster - and finally gave up. On the plus side, during the time that SGE was used, I have never seen a process left behind from a job and the queueing system itself seemed very stable - something that I could not say for the OpenPBS/Torque that I've also tested at that time. -- Bogdan Costescu IWR, University of Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 54 8240, Fax: +49 6221 54 8850 E-mail: bogdan.costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Please help to setup Beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Please help to setup Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
