[Beowulf] Problems scaling performance to more than one node, GbE
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Nicholas M Glykos glykos at mbg.duth.grSat Feb 14 02:13:49 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Problems scaling performance to more than one node, GbE
- Next message: [Beowulf] Problems scaling performance to more than one node, GbE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Tiago, <snip> > I tried with Gromacs ... </snip> Concerning your MD tests, would it be worthwhile to check also NAMD's parallel efficiency ? Based on past experience, I would suggest that you try both the UDP- & TCP-based versions (don't forget to use the +giga and possibly the +atm flags). Also, keep in mind that parallel efficiency varies greatly with problem size (for example, you should expect very different results from, say, a 1,500 atom peptide system, as compared with a 100,000 atoms large protein system). > From what I could also digg around, it seems that some switches have too > much latency and hamper any kind of proper performance from GbE. Were this > my case, any benchmarks I could use to test that theory out? We have been using NetPipe (http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/netpipe/) to measure latency, but the experts on this list will probably tell you more about the subjest that you'd ever wished to know ;-) Nicholas -- Dr Nicholas M. Glykos, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, University Campus, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece, Fax +302551030620 Tel ++302551030620 (77620), http://www.mbg.duth.gr/~glykos/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Problems scaling performance to more than one node, GbE
- Next message: [Beowulf] Problems scaling performance to more than one node, GbE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
