[Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
mwill at penguincomputing.com
Thu Feb 12 11:31:29 PST 2009
For large non-lustre filesystems of that size, we have been deploying
XFS successfully for the last 3-4 years at least. We have a few
deployments using centos plus to get it onto a redhat based system
but generally have to chose Novell SLES to get a fully supported XFS
Cheers, Michael Will
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:44:55PM -0500, Joe Landman wrote:
> Dan.Kidger at quadrics.com wrote:
>> And anyway - I thought the maximum size for ext3 was 8TB ?
> It is w/o the patches. With patches it can get to 16TB. I seem to
> remember that the 16TB required an 8kB page size (e.g. Itanium2 kernel).
>> I know that there are patches to bring it up to 16TB, but does
>> anybody trust these and use them for production systems?
> I am sure a few people are using this. We just don't advise/recommend
> this file system at these sizes.
> Lustre uses a (significantly patched) ext3 right now to get beyond 8TB
> per OSD. Since they appear to be migrating over to zfs, and their
> patches aren't in the kernel yet (will go back and recheck), this is
> still a problem.
> Since we have customers/users with 40+ TB on single boxen we don't
> normally recommend file systems that run close to their limits in daily
> usage scenarios. That and fsck ... well ...
> Joseph Landman, Ph.D
> Founder and CEO
> Scalable Informatics LLC,
> email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
> web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
> phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
> fax : +1 866 888 3112
> cell : +1 734 612 4615
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf