[Beowulf] if you had 2 switches and a bunch of cable, what would you do?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Reuti reuti at staff.uni-marburg.deMon Dec 21 04:38:06 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] if you had 2 switches and a bunch of cable,what would you do?
- Next message: [Beowulf] if you had 2 switches and a bunch of cable, what would you do?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Am 21.12.2009 um 10:54 schrieb Hearns, John: > Option 1. Create 2 separate internal networks. In wiring drawings for > clusters, I often see one administrative network and one for > computations (mpi, and so forth). first a matter of definition: what's "administrative network"? Just the option to ssh to a node & SGE, or to have access to some facitility of a dedicated service processor like "Lights Out" management? In the former case, I would do it the other way round: use the primary one for ssh, SGE and MPI, and the second one for NFS. Simply because then there is no need to alter the generated list of hosts (ssh to the nodes is in my case only for admin staff anyway), and SGE's is communication to the nodes is not so high (When local spool directories on the nodes are used, there is no further communication needed to store this informaton. Otherwise it will go via NFS to the central spool directory, but this would be the second network then.) With some MPI implementations it can be tricky (but possible) to force them to use the secondary interface, especially for both directions. In MPICH(1) (old, but sometimes still used) also the environment variable MPI_HOST must be set to have the name of the secondary interface. Well, you need a second (or third) network for the headnode then: one for NFS and maybe one for going to the outside world (this way all internal traffic can use private addresses and are invisible from the outside). == If the administrative network is "Lights Out" management, I would look for a switch with less performance laying around. If your servers have it built-in, I would use it. If you have enough ports on the switches, you can also connect it to the first network from above. -- Reuti > Paul, definitely recommend option 1. > Use the second switch for MPI traffic. > > The way you achieve this is to use your batch scheduling system and > run > a script > which takes the machines list provided by the batch system and > translates it into one > which is fed to to the mpirun utility, ie the hostnames are turned > into > something like > hostname-eth1 > > The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive > use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error > you should not copy it, retransmit it, use it or disclose its > contents but should return it to the sender immediately and delete > your copy. > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin > Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] if you had 2 switches and a bunch of cable,what would you do?
- Next message: [Beowulf] if you had 2 switches and a bunch of cable, what would you do?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
