[Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Dec 16 00:01:18 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Next message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:41:59PM -0500, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > So, instead of requiring ~4K per port minimum, you need about ~20K per > port. Add to that up to 8 priorities with DCB and the buffering > requirement are quickly getting out of hand. Don't worry, switch vendors will simply implement it all poorly, just like InfiniBand. That's what always happens with overly-complicated QOS schemes. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Next message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list