[Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comMon Dec 14 11:35:14 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Next message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Patrick Geoffray <patrick at myri.com> wrote: > > Most 10GE NIC have no problems reaching line rate at 1500 Bytes (the > standard Ethernet MTU), the problem is the host OS stack (mainly TCP) where > the per-packet overhead is important. One trick that all 10GE NICs worth > their salt are doing these days is to fake a large MTU at the OS level, > while keeping the wire MTU at 1500 Bytes (for compatibility). This is called > TSO (Transmit Send Offload) and LRO (Large Receive Offload). The OS stack is > using a virtual MTU of 64K and the NIC does segmentation/reassembly in > hardware, sort of. The TSO and LRO are only relevant to TCP though, aren't they? I am using RDMA so that shouldn't matter. Maybe I am wrong. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Next message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
