[Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgSun Dec 13 18:26:04 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Next message: [Beowulf] [hpc-announce] CFP: 24th International Conference on Supercomputing (ICS'10) - 4 weeks remaining
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- "Patrick Geoffray" <patrick at myri.com> wrote: > richard.walsh at comcast.net wrote: > > > The common MTU of 1500 was not chosen arbitrarily, > > Never underestimate what a standard committee can do. Viz the compromise of a 48 byte payload (53 byte cell) for ATM between the US and Europe.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asynchronous_transfer_mode#Why_cells.3F cheers, Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Performance tuning for Jumbo Frames
- Next message: [Beowulf] [hpc-announce] CFP: 24th International Conference on Supercomputing (ICS'10) - 4 weeks remaining
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
