[Beowulf] Re: cluster fails to boot with managed switch, but5-port switch works OK
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael Will mwill at penguincomputing.comWed Dec 2 14:14:54 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: cluster fails to boot with managed switch, but5-port switch works OK
- Next message: [Beowulf] lamexec vs mpirun
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I got another one for you from penguins support team: enable port forward Sent from Moxier Mail (http://www.moxier.com) ----- Original Message ----- From:"Rahul Nabar" <rpnabar at gmail.com> To:"Michael Will" <mwill at penguincomputing.com> Cc:"Hearns, John" <john.hearns at mclaren.com>, "beowulf at beowulf.org" <beowulf at beowulf.org> Sent:12/2/2009 1:42 PM Subject:Re: [Beowulf] Re: cluster fails to boot with managed switch, but5-port switch works OK On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Michael Will <mwill at penguincomputing.com> wrote: > I don't know anything about smc switches, but for cisco switches I had to enable 'spanning-tree portfast default' before to allow a >pxe booting node to stay up. Maybe the smc switch has something similar that prevents the port from being fully useable until some >spanning tree algorithm terminates? +1 for the spanning tree suggestion. I needed to do the same on my Dell Catalyst. Check if "DHCP squash" on the port connected to the master node is enabled. This can prevent DHCP. Just a thought. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: cluster fails to boot with managed switch, but5-port switch works OK
- Next message: [Beowulf] lamexec vs mpirun
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
