[Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter Kjellstrom cap at nsc.liu.seWed Dec 2 12:28:07 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 02 December 2009, Hearns, John wrote: > I'm a new member to this list, but the research group that I work for has > had a working cluster for many years. I am now looking at upgrading our > current configuration. ... > Mixing modern multi-core hardware with an older OS release which worked > with those old disk drivers and Ethernet drivers will be a nightmare. But why run an older OS release? Something like CentOS-5.latest will run fine on your new hardware and it's no problem getting all sorts of old HPC code to run on it (disclaimer: of course you can find a zillion apps that break on any given OS...). > I was wondering if anyone has actual experience with running more than one > node from a single power supply. ... > Look at the Supermicro twin systems, they have two motherboards in 1U or > four motherboards in 2U. > > I believe HP have similar. They have 4-nodes in 2U (it has the added benefint of using large 8cm fans instead of those inefficient 1U fans...). Supermicro also has a 4-nodes in 2U. > Or of course any of the blade chassis – Supermicro, HP, Sun and dare I say > it SGI. We've typically found that blade chassi type hardware is far from cost effective for HPC, but YMMV. > On a smaller scale you could look at the ‘personal supercomputers’ from > Cray and SGI. Even less cost effective (I think). > The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of > the intended recipient... Good job sending it to a public e-mail list then. > If you receive this email in error you should not > copy it, retransmit it, use it or disclose its contents but should return > it to the sender immediately and delete your copy. /Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20091202/a39cf63d/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
