[Beowulf] nearly future of Larrabee
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mikhail Kuzminsky kus at free.netMon Aug 24 09:21:40 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] nearly future of Larrabee
- Next message: [Beowulf] Help for terrible NFS write performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In message from Bogdan Costescu <bcostescu at gmail.com> (Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:17:08 +0200): >2009/8/21 Mikhail Kuzminsky <kus at free.net>: >> Q3. Does it means that Larrabee will give essential speedup also on >>relative >> short vectors ? > >I don't quite understand your question... > For example, will DAXPY give essential speedup (percent of peak performance) for N=10 or 100 for example (for matrix and vector), and will DGEMM give high performance for meduim sizes of matrices - or we'll need large N values - for example, 1000, 10000 etc ? What is about gather/scatter/etc for vector processing, the compilers for Cray T90/C90 ... Cray 1, NEC SX-6/5/4... performs, I beleive, all the necessary things. Mikhail Mikhail
- Previous message: [Beowulf] nearly future of Larrabee
- Next message: [Beowulf] Help for terrible NFS write performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
