[Beowulf] Wake on LAN supported on both built-in interfaces ... ??
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
richard.walsh at comcast.net richard.walsh at comcast.netThu Aug 13 16:56:33 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] parallelization problem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Wake on LAN supported on both built-in interfaces ... ??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
All, I have a head node that am trying to get WOL set up on. It is a SuperMicro motherboard (X8DTi-F) with two built in interfaces (eth0, eth1). I am told by SuperMicro support that both interfaces support WOL fully, but when I probe them with ethtool only eth0 indicates that it supports WOL with: ... Supports Wake-on: umbg Wake-on: g ... $ethtool eth1 ... yields: ... Supports Wake-on: d Wake-on: d ... Attempting: ethtool -s eth1 wol g fails indicating (as expected) indicating: "Cannot set new wake-on-lan settings: Operation not supported not setting wol" The same command on eth0 works fine. I have set up eth0 to be my internal (private interface) and eth1 to be the internet facing interface. I would like avoid reworking everything ... ;-) ... Any thoughts? Go arounds? Is SuperMicro telling me the truth about both interfaces providing full support. Perhaps I am missing some configuration option in the BIOS. SuperMicro says I am not, but ... Thanks, rbw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20090813/b5820993/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] parallelization problem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Wake on LAN supported on both built-in interfaces ... ??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
