Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] bizarre scaling behavior on a Nehalem

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.com
Wed Aug 12 10:56:11 PDT 2009


On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Craig Tierney<Craig.Tierney at noaa.gov> wrote:
> What do you mean normally?  I am running Centos 5.3 with 2.6.18-128.2.1
> right now on a 448 node Nehalem cluster.  I am so far happy with how things work.
> The original Centos 5.3 kernel, 2.6.18-128.1.10 had bugs in Nelahem support
> where nodes would just start randomly run slow.  Upgrading the kernel
> fixed that.  But that performance problem was either all or none, I don't recall
> it exhibiting itself in the way that Rahul described.
>

For me it shows:

Linux version 2.6.18-128.el5 (mockbuild at builder10.centos.org)

I am a bit confused with the numbering scheme, now. Is this older or
newer than Craigs? You are right Craig, I haven't noticed any random
slowdowns but my data is statistically sparse. I only have a single
Nehalem+CentOS test node right now.

-- 
Rahul




More information about the Beowulf mailing list