[Beowulf] The True Cost of HPC Cluster Ownership
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tim Cutts tjrc at sanger.ac.ukTue Aug 11 09:32:53 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The True Cost of HPC Cluster Ownership
- Next message: [Beowulf] The True Cost of HPC Cluster Ownership
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11 Aug 2009, at 3:38 pm, Daniel Pfenniger wrote: > Douglas Eadline wrote: >> All, >> I posted this on ClusterMonkey the other week. >> It is actually derived from a white paper I wrote for >> SiCortex. I'm sure those on this list have some >> experience/opinions with these issues (and other >> cluster issues!) >> The True Cost of HPC Cluster Ownership >> http://www.clustermonkey.net//content/view/262/1/ > > This article sounds unbalanced and self-serving. > > While it I clear that self-made clusters imply added new costs > in regard of turn-key clusters, they also empower the buyer > using standard and open solutions by an increased independence from > the vendor, and increases also its knowledge for future choices. > This aspect is hard to measure in monetary terms, but certainly very > important for some users. I agree. Some of the biggest IT problems I've encountered have been a direct result of vendor lock-in. Companies get bought, and products crushed. The wind changes direction, and products get dropped, side- lined, changed more or less on a whim. Rash promises made by vendors which never come true. In our case it was the dismembering of DEC during its various acquisitions which hurt us, and that saga contains examples of most of the above. And then the customer has to start again, which can be enormously expensive in terms of researching new ways to go, and migrating services. Just one part of that saga (the abandonment of the AdvFS filesystem) cost us more than six months of continuous work to get past, just copying the data onto something else. That was years ago; with the petabytes of data we have now, it would be even worse. Once bitten, twice shy. If you've made the investment in house to have a vendor-agnostic setup, which we now have, we have complete freedom to choose whatever tin vendor we like, at least as far as our compute nodes go. Our configuration, deployment and management software stack works on anything, so it's very little skin off our nose to change vendor. Regards, Tim -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The True Cost of HPC Cluster Ownership
- Next message: [Beowulf] The True Cost of HPC Cluster Ownership
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
