[Beowulf] 1 multicore machine cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jonathan Aquilina eagles051387 at gmail.comFri Apr 24 05:07:44 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 1 multicore machine cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1 multicore machine cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
in a way arent multicore processors taking for example 4 single core machines and merging them into one with 1 for core processor? On 4/24/09, Glen Beane <Glen.Beane at jax.org> wrote: > > > > On 4/24/09 3:03 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eagles051387 at gmail.com> wrote: > > im impressed with the different views everyone has. i dont know how many of > you would agree with me a multicore processor lets say a quad is 4 nodes in > one. could one say it like that? > > I would not. To me a node is a physical thing. One or more processor(s), > RAM, running its own OS instance. I have a cluster of N nodes with M cores > per node, or N*M total cores. > > In your example, N is 1 and M is 4. > > One thing that annoys me is when an intern working on an MPI program keeps > saying "node" when they really mean MPI rank since we are long past the days > where we have a 1 to 1 mapping between MPI ranks and nodes (we don't do any > kind of hybrid thing where we have 1 multi-threaded process per node). > > > > -- > Glen L. Beane > Software Engineer > The Jackson Laboratory > Phone (207) 288-6153 > > -- Jonathan Aquilina
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 1 multicore machine cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1 multicore machine cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
