[Beowulf] doubt about job queuing systems
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caFri Apr 17 11:15:50 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] doubt about job queuing systems
- Next message: [Beowulf] doubt about job queuing systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> When I argue that many other computational electromagnetics programs such as > FEKO <http://www.feko.info> can run in batch mode without any X output and > can be sheduled directly by external job queueing system, engineer from CST > declares that kind of program not starting a GUI is old-fashioned... > > Are they telling the truth, or just lying? normally, it's the solver that uses MPI, not the gui. so the gui will set up jobs, and submit them to the cluster's queue, but itself really only runs on a "login" node. this is mainly motivated by a concern for the user's workflow, as far as I can tell - desire to make it as IDE or "studio"-like as possible. in the several similar packages I've integrated, there are usually some sort of hooks available for determining the exact commandline for submitting a job. after all, even if assuming LSF, a particular site will often have idiosyncratic parameters and switches. normally these hooks can be transformed into using completely different submission commands (though in the worst case, you could just write a quick "bsub" emulator that did the right thing for your cluster.) regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] doubt about job queuing systems
- Next message: [Beowulf] doubt about job queuing systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
