[Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns hearnsj at googlemail.comSun Apr 5 08:38:27 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/4/5 Jason Riedy <jason at acm.org>: > I'm more shocked that no one has written up using cfengine for > managing laptops. It seems a perfect model. With the more open > development model, perhaps it'll come back. But its competitors > are more "web 2.0 cool." Indeed. We are all just lumbering dinosaurs here. We endlessly discuss benchmarking, performance, use of high-grade compilers, file systems which go like stink and scale like crazy, interconnects which let us use thousands of cores and tbytes of memory on the same problem at once. Do we not notice the little birds running about our feet who are twittering(*) about elastic cloud computing to the managers, and how all computing will be done via web services on the Cloud, and how their businesses should all be virtualised to the point of not having these crusty olf Frotran (Fortran! Ha!) types and their emergency stacks of punch cards. (*) pun intended. For which I should be shot at dawn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
