[Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comSat Apr 4 12:19:02 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 04:06:22PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:32:13PM -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > > > Will have to do with embedded memory or stacked 3d memory a la > > > http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~loh/Papers/isca2008-3Ddram.pdf > > > > We've been building bigger and bigger SMPs for a long time, making > > changes to improve the memory system as needed. How is multicore any > > Off-die memory bandwidth and latency are limited, so many codes > start running into memory bottlenecks even at moderate number > of cores Exactly like shared-bus multiprocessors. The incremental method of solving this is what Opteron/Nehalem does. The more radical method is what Origin/Altix did. It all comes down to how many pins you're willing to commit to memory and how few pins you can squeeze a memory bus down to; once you bump up against that limit, then you need an improvement in packaging, which is no more radical than what Opteron/Nehalem or Origin/Altix did. And, of course, all this was invented before Opteron or Origin. The sky is not falling. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
