[Beowulf] mpich vs hp mpi performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Linus Harling linus at ussarna.seFri Sep 26 09:28:38 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark/apps showing benefit from instruction set advances
- Next message: [Beowulf] mpich vs hp mpi performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alan Louis Scheinine skrev: > It depends very much on hardware and on the specific program. > My experience with MPICH on Ethernet and MVAPICH, MVAPICH2, > OpenMPI on Infiniband is that different programs find one > or the other better, no clear winner. Also, small changes > in some options that one learns about from other sites or > from Google can make big differences in performance. Thank you for the input! The system is a Dell T605 2x4core Opteron 2354 with 32GB RAM. With a second one like it being added (probably using ethernet) if need arises. Which means most/all of the communication will be by shared memory to begin with. The app is LS-DYNA, a FEM-suite from LSTC: http://www.ls-dyna.com/ I'm just a sysadmin tasked with installing the machine, and have limited knowledge in math, but my guess is that the code is quite communication-heavy considering the specs of the machine and an assumption that FEM is essentially SIMD. Am I correct in my assumptions and does anyone have any experience of different mpi-implementations on such codes? /Linus H > I regret that I have no organized documentation or performance > tables that could provide a more precise answer. > Alan Scheinine
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark/apps showing benefit from instruction set advances
- Next message: [Beowulf] mpich vs hp mpi performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
