[Beowulf] One network, or two?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Prentice Bisbal prentice at ias.eduTue Sep 23 12:27:41 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Next message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alan Ward wrote: > > Good day. > > I have been reading the ongoing discussion on network usage with some > interest, mainly because in all (admittedly very small, 4 to 8 node) > clusters we have set up so far, we have always gone with doubling the > network. Nowadays we mostly run a 100 MBit/s "el cheapo" FastEthernet > for control, NFS and monitoring, while the faster Gigabit is exclusively > for MPI. Applications are CFD, with various levels of granularity. > > Anybody care to comment? > > -Alan My new cluster, which is still in labor, will have InfiniBand for MPI, and we have 10 Gb ethernet switches for management/NFS, etc. The nodes only have 1 Gb ethernet, so it will be effectively a 1 Gb network. I'm also curious as to whether the dual networks are overkill, and if using a slower network for I/O will cause the system to be slower than doing all traffic over IB, since I/O will be slower and cause the nodes to wait longer for these ops to finish. -- Prentice
- Previous message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Next message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
