[Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comThu Sep 18 14:42:44 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Next message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:25:36PM -0700, Martin Siegert wrote: > It is my impression that the standard was not written with HPC in > mind: it addresses the scenario of running many streams over a few > links, i.e., load balancing (and HA). Except that in HPC, you're often talking to several neighbors. And even more neighbors if you have multiple cores per node. For example, if you have a 2D grid of nodes, and you have to exchange halos to the N S E W, then a node will talk to at least 4 neighbors (if you cleverly lay things out and combine messages), but more likely 12 neighbors, or maybe even 32. That's a lot more than 2 links. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Next message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
