[Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eric Thibodeau kyron at neuralbs.comWed Sep 17 17:40:44 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Mathog wrote: > Getting back to the original subject, what would this Cray box "look > like" when it is running windows? Does it show up as one desktop for > everything (basically an SMP machine), one desktop per blade, one per > processor(or core), or even virtualized, with more than one desktop per > core? In terms of administering the box the first of these would be by > far the easiest to deal with, since there would only be the one copy of > Windows present. > I seriously doubt that MS is presenting the entire system as a huge SMP. If it's the case, I'd stay away from it since it implies that either you have to use a proprietary API to get performance (inter-core communications à la MPI) or that the model is OpenMosix ish...which IMHO is a nice theory, horrible practice model. My impression/technical view of it is that the system most probably runs off a "master" board with slave boards which boot using a network image (pretty much like NFS roots). It is the most logical approach, again, IMHO (single point of management and all) > Regards, > > David Mathog > mathog at caltech.edu > Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: MS Cray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
