[Beowulf] Lustre failover
bernd.schubert at fastmail.fm
Wed Sep 10 08:42:52 PDT 2008
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 16:34:45 Mark Hahn wrote:
> >> active/active seems strange to me - it implies that the bottleneck
> >> is the OSS (OST server), rather than the disk itself. and a/a means
> >> each OSS has to do more locking for the shared disk, which would seem
> >> to make the problem worse...
> > No, you can do active/active with several systems
> > Raid1
> > / \
> > OSS1 OSS2
> > \ /
> > Raid2
> > (Raid1 and Raid2 are hardware raid systems).
> > Now OSS1 will primarily serve Raid1 and OSS2 will primarily serve Raid2.
> > So
> yes, I know - that's how HP SFS is set up. the OP was talking
> active-active, though, meaning that IO at any instant can go to either OSS
> and still make it onto a particular raid. otherwise it's active/passive,
> what SFS does.
You mean to either OSS, but still on the very same OST ;) No, that won't work,
simply not the way Lustre works.
Q-Leap Networks GmbH
More information about the Beowulf