[Beowulf] Re: Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Prentice Bisbal prentice at ias.eduTue Sep 9 10:15:29 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Next message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeff Johnson wrote: > >> A Xeon is a Xeon is a Xeon. >> > This is a very true statement. > > Unfortunately for many, the commonality ends where the processor and > socket meet. There is a great deal of deviation in motherboard designs. > Some are much better than others and it is not always based on the > location of the factory (China versus Japan, USA, etc). > > Intel, as an example, releases a reference design and bios definition > that is usually the gold standard for a particular type of platform. > Many companies will take this design and modify it to fit their needs > and in the process streamline the design. That is usually a cost driven > exercise. > A few years ago, when the 64-bit Opterons were still relatively new, I read this article on the HyperTransport (HT) architecture in SysAdmin magazine. At the time, according to the article, out of all the different companies selling Opteron-based systems, the HP Proliant DL-585 was one of the few that fully implemented the HT architecture. http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9408/sam0411b/0411b.htm So yeah, there' s a lot more to computer performance than the type of processor and socket on the motherboard. -- Prentice
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Next message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
