[Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Prentice Bisbal prentice at ias.eduMon Sep 8 13:18:43 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman wrote: > Prentice Bisbal wrote: > > [...] > >> Getting back to hardware, I've always been impressed with the robustness >> of HP Proliant hardware > > Of course, the dirty little (not so) secret of tier 1 systems are that > they are all built by the same 2-3 contract manufacturers, from the same > parts troughs ...... > > .... there is an economic reason for this. I'm sure. The bike business is the same way. For the most part (there are exceptions), a handful of bike factories make all the bikes for the different bike companies, the country of manufacture determines the cost of manufacturing and price: Japan: Highest quality and price Taiwan: Middle quality and price China: Lowest quality and price Usually the highest-end models are made in-house, so this doesn't apply the them. Even at the same factory, each vendor can specify the quality of manufacture (quality of materials/components, tolerances, and thoroughness of Q/A testing), and pay accordingly. I'm sure even in the computer world a similar rule applies. $ = cheap components, $$= better components, etc. -- Prentice
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: GPU boards and cluster servers.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
