[Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lux, James P james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Sep 3 10:39:27 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/3/08 10:34 AM, "Peter St. John" <peter.st.john at gmail.com> wrote: I'm thinking that multicore will make topology interesting again, because of the difference between intercore on a common chip vs going through a nic to even the fastest fabric. Peter Yes, indeed.. Actually, it may be more like deja vu, because the core has it's own little address space, and then the space available through the fabric (which looks a lot, conceptually, like the pile of 386 PC with 10BaseT). Even more interesting will be that to effectively use them, some conceptual thought will have to be put into effectively using the techniques for communicating among processes, which don't necessarily run in lockstep systolic array fashion (or SIMD). Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080903/7279357f/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
