[Beowulf] Idle core on overloaded CPU?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Carsten Aulbert carsten.aulbert at aei.mpg.deFri Oct 24 04:25:09 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Security issues
- Next message: [Beowulf] Anyone going to SC08 up for an informal BOF on cluster security?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, (I send this yesterday already to LKML, so sorry if you receive this twice), on Intel X3220 CPU based systems (4 physical cores) I came across the following thing (Debian etch, with vanilla kernel 2.6.25.9): starting the following: $ screen -d -m stress -c 2 $ nice -19 screen -d -m stress -c 4 This causes two cores to be 100% busy in user state and one core to be busy in 100% nice state. However, the remaining core is idle. Even watching it over longer stretches of time, the situation remains static. I guess it's a kernel misconfiguration on my part (config available here: https://n0.aei.uni-hannover.de/linux/kernel/config-2.6.25.9-nodes ), but if not could this be a scheduling bug? Thanks for any hint Cheers Carsten PS: In the mean time we have made similar tests on a dual CPU, dual core opteron machine with the same results (on a different kernel, 2.6.24.x). Most bizarre was this result (thanks Steffen!): 6 jobs with nice 19, one with nice 0: Core 1: 100% with nice 0 Core 2: 100% with single nice 19 Core 3: 2*50% (nice 19) Core 4: 3*33% (nice 19) That's definitely something I would not expect.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Security issues
- Next message: [Beowulf] Anyone going to SC08 up for an informal BOF on cluster security?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
