[Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Oct 22 10:23:08 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Are there some informal comparisons of Shanghai vs Nehalem? > > I beleive that Shanghai performance increase in comparison w/Barcelona will > be practically defined only by possible higher Shanghai frequencies. is that based on anything hands-on? IMO, AMD needs to get a bit more serious about competing. if I7 ships with ~15 GB/s per socket and working multi-socket scalability, it's hard to imagine why anyone would bother to look at AMD. either: - there is some sort of significant flaw with I7 (runs like a dog in 64b mode or Hf turns into blue cheese after a year, etc). - AMD gets its act together (lower-latency L3, highly efficient ddr3/1333 interface, directory-based coherence). - AMD satisfies itself with bottom-feeding (which probably also means only low-end consumer stuff with little HPC interest). I've had good reason to be an AMD fan in recent-ish years, but if Intel is firing on all cylinders, AMD needs to be the rotary engine or have more cylinders, or something...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
