[Beowulf] Nehalem Xeons
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Oct 15 14:19:14 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem Xeons
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nehalem Xeons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Sounds like Intel has something to hide. Often companies like Intel have an embargo date solely to make sure that all the great new performance news arrives at once, generating a lot of press alongside the formal announcement of availability. I also had one case years ago where I was doing a big benchmark for a bid on a new processor. We had pre-release parts. The release parts were 10% slower, across the board on all of our benchmarks. Memory intensive, cache intensive, fp intensive, int intensive, it was all slower by about the same amount. That was a real head-scratcher, since the cpu clock was the same. AMD sends out pre-release Opterons to partners, often times running at pretty low clock rates. It's very useful for compiler testing, and can provide more opportunity to find chip bugs. Needless to say, no benchmarks from these really slow parts can be published. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem Xeons
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nehalem Xeons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
