[Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jan Heichler jan.heichler at gmx.netThu Nov 20 08:39:26 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hallo Mark, Donnerstag, 20. November 2008, meintest Du: >> [shameless plug] >> A project I have spent some time with is showing 117x on a 3-GPU machine over >> a single core of a host machine (3.0 GHz Opteron 2222). The code is >> mpihmmer, and the GPU version of it. See http://www.mpihmmer.org for more >> details. Ping me offline if you need more info. >> [/shameless plug] MH> I'm happy for you, but to me, you're stacking the deck by comparing to a MH> quite old CPU. you could break out the prices directly, but comparing 3x MH> GPU (modern? sounds like pci-express at least) to a current entry-level MH> cluster node (8 core2/shanghai cores at 2.4-3.4 GHz) be more appropriate. Instead of benchmarking some CPU vs. some GPU wouldn't it be fairer to a) compare systems of similar costs (1k, 2k, 3k EUR/USD) b) compare systems with a similar power footprint ? What does it help that 3 GPUs are 1000x faster than a Asus Eee PC? Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20081120/5db746e4/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
