[Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Nov 20 06:58:27 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Ellis, I can't say re. the Firestream cards, but for Nvidia the answer is a > resounding yes. AMD had some PR recently (check the reg and inq) about supporting their stream stuff across the whole product line, including chipset-integrated gpus. that seems intelligent, given that lines between CPU and GPU are obviously blurring in the future (Larrabee, Fusion, etc). IMO, it would be crazy to invest too much in the current gen of gp-gpu programming stuff. doing some pilot stuff with both vendors probably makes sense, but the field really does need OpenCL to succeed. I hope the OpenCL people are not too OpenGL-ish, and realize that they need to target SSE and SSE512 as well. > Virtually any recent card can run CUDA code. If you Google you can get a > list of compatible cards. not that many NVidia cards support DP yet though, which is probably important to anyone coming from the normal HPC world... there's some speculation that NV will try to keep DP as a market segmentation feature to drive HPC towards high-cost Tesla cards, much as vendors have traditionally tried to herd high-end vis into 10x priced cards. regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
