[Beowulf] Re: RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lombard, David N dnlombar at ichips.intel.comTue Nov 11 15:39:02 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
- Next message: [Beowulf] RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 06:51:46AM -0800, Dave Love wrote: > Prentice Bisbal <prentice at ias.edu> writes: > > > The advantage of using IPMI is that it is hardware based, so there > > shouldn't be any OS noise to slow down the MPI calculations. > > Yes iff you do it out-of-band, which is probably less convenient, and is > significantly slower on our systems, at least. Actually, is it clear > that interacting with the firmware generally won't cause any jitter? I > could imagine it might. IPMI lives on the BMC. That's not to say there's zero interaction, but the impact of OOB IPMI should really be very limited. > Our vendor installed a daemon doing in-band IPMI sensor probes which I > didn't initially know about, since it wasn't sending the ganglia metrics > correctly anyhow. I don't know whether that means they disagree with > the effect on MPI performance or what. It's a preference issue; there are reasonable arguments to be made in either direction. -- David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
- Next message: [Beowulf] RRDtools graphs of temp from IPMI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
