[Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.govTue May 27 17:39:07 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
- Next message: [Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Quoting "Lombard, David N" <dnlombar at ichips.intel.com>, on Tue 27 May 2008 05:02:30 PM PDT: >> >> I wasn't implying that ISVs were the cause of their demise. I was >> implying that they couldn't build a convincing case for them to get on >> board. > > To put a finer point on this, ISVs ask: How do I get incremental revenue > from this? Clearly such incremental revenue must be a sufficiently healthy > multiple of their costs. > Just so... The value of a supercomputer under the desk is primarily to the end user (faster whatever to free up an expensive engineer's time). They don't see much difference between buying the software for a single processor or multiprocessor. The ISV won't get many incremental sales from having a fast box to run it on, because the customer would probably buy it in any case. The end user isn't interested in paying the ISV to port it to the "supercomputer in a box" at least not on any scale comparable to the actual cost of doing the port (i.e. they'd probably be willing to spend <2x for the ported version, but they're also already forking out the bucks for the box, too.. They tend to view that as the extent of what they're willing to invest. Jim
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
- Next message: [Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
