[Beowulf] Mix different drives in RAID (WD4000YR and WD5000YS)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Yaroslav Halchenko list-beowulf at onerussian.comWed May 21 08:22:27 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: TOE on Linux
- Next message: [Beowulf] Mix different drives in RAID (WD4000YR and WD5000YS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Beowulfers,
I had 1 drive failed in the RAID (WD4000YR) so I sent it for replacement
and got back (WD5000YS), so it is of similar series but larger in
capacity. Performance metrics of replacement seems to be at least as
good as of old one. But I still wonder if RAID would digest it nicely
(we use Areca ARC1160) and I don't want to try it hard way (ie use
new one as a spare and wait until raid fails and starts rebuilding).
Areca controller has Capacity Truncation capability so larger size of a
new drive should be (theoretically) ok, but I still wonder what
implications I might encounter. May be someone could share ideas or
experience?
Thanks in advance!
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080521/6ef6d387/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: TOE on Linux
- Next message: [Beowulf] Mix different drives in RAID (WD4000YR and WD5000YS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
