[Beowulf] Capacity / Capability Computing
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lawrence Stewart larry.stewart at sicortex.comTue May 20 06:23:46 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Capacity / Capability Computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] Capacity / Capability Computing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 20, 2008, at 8:39 AM, andrew holway wrote: > Okay, for those unwilling to leap the mental chasm :) > > Would anyone care to give me what they believe to be the definition of > Capacity / Capability Computing. In the HPC context, these words are used by the big labs to refer to different types of acquisitions. The largest systems (Roadrunner, any Petaflop system) are "capability" systems, the idea being that they can do something that really can't be done with a lesser machine. "Capacity" machines tend to be run-of-the mill blocks of 10 TF or so, 1000 cores or so, that bulk up the aggregate throughput capacity of the collection of systems. They are intended for large numbers of medium size jobs. So Sandia's "Thunderbird" seems to be viewed as a capacity system, nothing terribly special about it, but it can get a bunch of work done. -L
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Capacity / Capability Computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] Capacity / Capability Computing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
