[Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
stephen mulcahy smulcahy at aplpi.comMon May 12 01:28:29 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > Last I saw someone doing this, IPMI sharing an ethernet port with the > host led to all kinds of weird ARP problems. Whereas a dedicated port > is much easier to configure. My favorite vendors all offer a > dedicated port... Yes, same here - I've done some experimentation on a node with IPMI and shared port and it was pretty horrible to get working properly. What software tools are people using to manage IPMI? I've dabbled with some vendor tools and being underwhelmed, and some of the tools that come with Linux seemed to half-work (maybe thats the norm?). -stephen -- Stephen Mulcahy, Applepie Solutions Ltd., Innovation in Business Center, GMIT, Dublin Rd, Galway, Ireland. +353.91.751262 http://www.aplpi.com Registered in Ireland, no. 289353 (5 Woodlands Avenue, Renmore, Galway)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
