[Beowulf] Purdue Supercomputer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed May 7 06:33:06 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> everything was going. This morning, we hit the last few mis-installs. Our DOA > nodes were around 1% of the total order.. one advantage of having the vendor pre-rack is that they usually also pre-test. did you consider having dell pre-assemble the cluster, and reject it for cost reasons? > The physical networking was done in a new way for us.. We used a large > Foundry switch and the MRJ21 cabling system for it. Each racks gets 24 nodes, > a 24 port passive patch panel, and 4 MRJ21 cables that run back to the if I understand, this means each node has a 1Gb link to a large switch, right? I'm a little surprised this was cost-effective - what is the intended workload of the cluster? (I mean given that Gb is usually considered high-latency and low-bandwidth.) I'd be curious to hear about your consideration of both 10G and IB.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Purdue Supercomputer
- Next message: [Beowulf] Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
