[Beowulf] many cores and ib
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jan Heichler jan.heichler at gmx.netMon May 5 23:46:26 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Next message: [Beowulf] Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hallo Jaime, Montag, 5. Mai 2008, meintest Du: JP> Hello, JP> Just a small question, does anybody has experience with many core JP> (16) nodes and infiniband? Since we have some users that need JP> shared memory but also we want to build a normal cluster for JP> mpi apps, we think that this could be a solution. Let's say about JP> 8 machines (96 processors) pus infiniband. Does it sound correct? JP> I'm aware of the bottleneck that means having one ib interface for JP> the mpi cores, is there any possibility of bonding? i had another idea. Roughly one can say that a quad socket system is three times as expensive as a dual socket system -> so you spend a lot of money for "some users". Maybe it is worth thinking about using dual-socket machines and test if scaleMP gives you a good performance over two of them combined. I have no experience with that but maybe you can find that out... For the interconnect it would be useful to know what and how your application is communicating. Big messages? Small messages? Complex operations? Maybe you can find out. Cheers, Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080506/d84e357a/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Next message: [Beowulf] Purdue Supercomputer
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
